7 Reasons the WorldTour Moved to Vekta

Performance Science

Performance Science

Performance Science

6

6

6

min

min

min

Dominic Valerio

Dominic Valerio

Dominic Valerio

Critical Power and W′ Explained: Insights from Alex Welburn

Critical Power and W′ Explained: Insights from Alex Welburn

For years, endurance training was defined by a few familiar acronyms: FTP, TSS, CTL…

They helped shape how cyclists trained, raced, and talked about fitness. But what if the assumptions behind those numbers are starting to show their limits?

In this new episode of The Roadman Podcast, host Anthony Walsh sits down with Alex Welburn, a leading researcher in W′ Balance and Critical Power, and a trusted Vekta Coach, to unpack how modern science is changing the way we understand performance. Together, they explore the shift from traditional FTP-based training to the more advanced world of Critical Power (CP) and W′, a framework that captures how athletes actually fatigue and recover in real time.

Why FTP and TSS Don’t Tell the Full Story

Alex begins by revisiting the familiar performance-management charts that coaches have relied on for years: chronic training load (CTL), acute training load (ATL), and the Training Stress Score (TSS). He explains how two sessions with identical TSS values can produce completely different physiological outcomes:

“You could have two riders both scoring 700 TSS a week, one through long steady volume, one through repeated high-intensity work, and the training adaptations will be totally different.

The issue, Alex says, is not separating volume from intensity. Without that distinction, you can’t see what’s really driving adaptation or fatigue. That’s exactly what Vekta’s Volume and Intensity model was built to address, isolating the total work done from the relative demand of that work. It’s how coaches move beyond generic load scores to understand what truly shapes an athlete’s response to training.

Critical Power: The New Baseline for Performance

Instead of relying on a single number like FTP, Alex advocates for the Critical Power (CP) model, a threshold that distinguishes between sustainable and unsustainable efforts. Where FTP estimates an hour’s power output, CP defines the line between the heavy and severe intensity domains. It captures not just how hard you can go, but for how long, and introduces a second parameter, W′, to describe the finite amount of energy you can expend above that line.

“When you go above Critical Power, you start depleting W′. Go below it, and you can recover. That’s what makes it a more dynamic model, it reflects how fatigue and recovery actually work.”

From Static Metrics to Dynamic Models

The conversation moves from abstract physiology to real-world coaching application. Alex and Anthony dig into what makes this shift from static metrics to dynamic models so transformative.

In the traditional world of TSS, CTL, and ATL, performance was measured by accumulation: more hours, more load, higher scores. But training doesn’t happen in a vacuum. Two rides can show identical numbers and leave the body in completely different states.

The CP + W′ framework changes that by introducing context: effort and recovery as living variables, not fixed values. Coaches can now quantify how work is being done, not just how much.

“You can have two riders with the same total load, but one is constantly dipping above CP while the other stays just below. On paper, they look identical. In reality, they’re adapting in completely different ways.”

It’s a model built for the way athletes actually ride, where fatigue accumulates unevenly, recovery happens in moments, and performance depends on timing as much as power.

For Coaches, This Means Better Questions:

• Why did a rider get dropped when the numbers looked fine on paper?
• How much work did they do above Critical Power in the lead-up to that climb?
• Are they recovering fast enough between efforts, or running the tank dry too early?

Vekta’s performance model is built on this same principle, every effort understood in context, every data point carrying intent. It’s where static charts end and real-time decision-making begins.

🎧 Listen or Watch the Full Episode

Watch or listen to the full conversation with Alex Welburn and Anthony Walsh on your platform of choice:

Discover the same platform trusted by Alex Welburn and other leading coaches shaping the next era of performance.

Start your free 14-day trial or Book a Demo



For years, endurance training was defined by a few familiar acronyms: FTP, TSS, CTL…

They helped shape how cyclists trained, raced, and talked about fitness. But what if the assumptions behind those numbers are starting to show their limits?

In this new episode of The Roadman Podcast, host Anthony Walsh sits down with Alex Welburn, a leading researcher in W′ Balance and Critical Power, and a trusted Vekta Coach, to unpack how modern science is changing the way we understand performance. Together, they explore the shift from traditional FTP-based training to the more advanced world of Critical Power (CP) and W′, a framework that captures how athletes actually fatigue and recover in real time.

Why FTP and TSS Don’t Tell the Full Story

Alex begins by revisiting the familiar performance-management charts that coaches have relied on for years: chronic training load (CTL), acute training load (ATL), and the Training Stress Score (TSS). He explains how two sessions with identical TSS values can produce completely different physiological outcomes:

“You could have two riders both scoring 700 TSS a week, one through long steady volume, one through repeated high-intensity work, and the training adaptations will be totally different.

The issue, Alex says, is not separating volume from intensity. Without that distinction, you can’t see what’s really driving adaptation or fatigue. That’s exactly what Vekta’s Volume and Intensity model was built to address, isolating the total work done from the relative demand of that work. It’s how coaches move beyond generic load scores to understand what truly shapes an athlete’s response to training.

Critical Power: The New Baseline for Performance

Instead of relying on a single number like FTP, Alex advocates for the Critical Power (CP) model, a threshold that distinguishes between sustainable and unsustainable efforts. Where FTP estimates an hour’s power output, CP defines the line between the heavy and severe intensity domains. It captures not just how hard you can go, but for how long, and introduces a second parameter, W′, to describe the finite amount of energy you can expend above that line.

“When you go above Critical Power, you start depleting W′. Go below it, and you can recover. That’s what makes it a more dynamic model, it reflects how fatigue and recovery actually work.”

From Static Metrics to Dynamic Models

The conversation moves from abstract physiology to real-world coaching application. Alex and Anthony dig into what makes this shift from static metrics to dynamic models so transformative.

In the traditional world of TSS, CTL, and ATL, performance was measured by accumulation: more hours, more load, higher scores. But training doesn’t happen in a vacuum. Two rides can show identical numbers and leave the body in completely different states.

The CP + W′ framework changes that by introducing context: effort and recovery as living variables, not fixed values. Coaches can now quantify how work is being done, not just how much.

“You can have two riders with the same total load, but one is constantly dipping above CP while the other stays just below. On paper, they look identical. In reality, they’re adapting in completely different ways.”

It’s a model built for the way athletes actually ride, where fatigue accumulates unevenly, recovery happens in moments, and performance depends on timing as much as power.

For Coaches, This Means Better Questions:

• Why did a rider get dropped when the numbers looked fine on paper?
• How much work did they do above Critical Power in the lead-up to that climb?
• Are they recovering fast enough between efforts, or running the tank dry too early?

Vekta’s performance model is built on this same principle, every effort understood in context, every data point carrying intent. It’s where static charts end and real-time decision-making begins.

🎧 Listen or Watch the Full Episode

Watch or listen to the full conversation with Alex Welburn and Anthony Walsh on your platform of choice:

Discover the same platform trusted by Alex Welburn and other leading coaches shaping the next era of performance.

Start your free 14-day trial or Book a Demo



Frequently asked questions

Alex Welburn is a leading researcher in W' Balance and Critical Power and a Vekta Coach. His research focuses on how athletes actually fatigue and recover in real time, and how Critical Power and W' provide a more accurate framework for endurance performance than traditional FTP-based models. He appears on The Roadman Podcast discussing the shift from legacy metrics to modern performance science.
Two sessions with identical TSS values can produce completely different physiological outcomes. As Alex Welburn explains, an athlete scoring 700 TSS through long steady volume adapts differently to one scoring 700 TSS through repeated high-intensity work. Without separating volume from intensity, you can't see what's really driving adaptation or fatigue. The single-score model hides the physiology.
Critical Power defines the line between heavy and severe intensity domains, not just an estimate of one-hour sustainable power. CP captures both how hard you can go and for how long. It introduces W' as a second parameter describing the finite work you can produce above CP. Together, CP and W' describe a dynamic two-variable system, not a single static threshold.
W' Balance is the real-time tracking of an athlete's anaerobic work capacity throughout a ride. Each time the athlete goes above CP, W' depletes. Each time they drop below CP, W' begins to recharge. W' Balance shows how much of the battery is available at any moment, enabling smarter pacing decisions during racing and more precise interval design during training.
It moves coaching from accumulation (more hours, more load, higher scores) to context (effort and recovery as living variables). Coaches can now answer better questions: why did a rider get dropped when the numbers looked fine? How much work did they do above CP before that climb? Are they recovering between efforts or running the tank dry too early? The framework reflects how athletes actually ride.
CTL and ATL track accumulated load over time but blend volume and intensity into a single trajectory. CP and W' describe physiological capacities, not load history. Two riders with identical CTL can have very different CP and W' values. CP and W' tell you what an athlete can do today. CTL and ATL tell you what they've done recently. Both have a place, but they answer different questions.
TSS collapses volume and intensity into one number. Vekta's model isolates the total work done from the relative demand of that work. As Alex Welburn explains, this lets coaches see what truly shapes an athlete's response to training: whether stress is coming from accumulated volume or from concentrated high-intensity efforts. Each has a different physiological cost and different recovery needs.
The full conversation between Alex Welburn and Anthony Walsh on The Roadman Podcast is available on YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and the Roadman Cycling website. The episode covers the shift from FTP and TSS to Critical Power and W', why dynamic models matter more than static metrics, and how the framework changes the questions coaches can ask about athlete performance.
Dominic Valerio
Dominic Valerio
Dominic Valerio

Brand Director